DHS Diecast Discussion Forum
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In

New style counterweight Options · View
projunkracing
Posted: Friday, October 17, 2014 10:19:07 PM
Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/30/2011
Posts: 26
Location: Lowell , Indiana
GC1
Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2014 1:25:48 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/26/2007
Posts: 1,706
Location: Australia
Great idea and smart thinking.
VIPCranes
Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2014 4:36:03 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/13/2011
Posts: 1,021
Location: California
How bout in 1:50 world.



Not the same crane but is close. This was a quick set up not finished yet.

SOMETHING IS BETTER THAN NOTHING.

http://s1185.photobucket.com/home/vipyfz2008/index

http://www.youtube.com/user/vipyfz?feature=mhee



luis.
Crane Crew
Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2014 7:08:37 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/14/2010
Posts: 113
Location: NQ Aust


Love it Luis....Applause Applause


Happy old fart Mark.

If you only do what you've always done, you will only get what you always got!

Save1er
Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2014 5:12:04 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/13/2014
Posts: 158
Location: Olympia, WA
Pretty neat concept but would this only be limited to just the LTR1220?
Hobie
Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2014 6:02:34 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/6/2012
Posts: 206
Save1er wrote:
Pretty neat concept but would this only be limited to just the LTR1220?

I bet it doesn't, just a matter of the crane's weight vs the amount of ballast they removed. I would bet the LTR 1100 could be used in some configurations.
bowej684
Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2014 6:35:25 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/12/2014
Posts: 4
That's awesome thanks for the LR weight tray too
JohnGalt
Posted: Saturday, October 18, 2014 7:36:28 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/27/2007
Posts: 1,489
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
I recall Breuer + Wasel doing something similar, about 10 years ago. It was their LR 1750 (soon to be sold to Thoemen, if I recall) using a 4- or 5-axle LTM as derrick ballast for raising the boom. There was a nice set of pictures on Hansebube.
Formu1fan
Posted: Sunday, October 19, 2014 1:26:56 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/20/2009
Posts: 497
Location: Tulsa OK
JohnGalt wrote:
I recall Breuer + Wasel doing something similar, about 10 years ago. It was their LR 1750 (soon to be sold to Thoemen, if I recall) using a 4- or 5-axle LTM as derrick ballast for raising the boom. There was a nice set of pictures on Hansebube.


Yup. It was used to decrease the truck loads in extra CW to the site. Very cool Liebherr is using it with factory support

-John
WCollins
Posted: Sunday, October 19, 2014 6:27:54 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/30/2011
Posts: 556
Location: Healdsburg CA.
JohnGalt wrote:
I recall Breuer + Wasel doing something similar, about 10 years ago. It was their LR 1750 (soon to be sold to Thoemen, if I recall) using a 4- or 5-axle LTM as derrick ballast for raising the boom. There was a nice set of pictures on Hansebube.


I assume your talking about this.

Fritz W. wrote:




Fritz


Posted here a while back.

-William
Jack of all trades, Master of none.
Miniature Construction Models
JohnGalt
Posted: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:50:09 AM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/27/2007
Posts: 1,489
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Thanks for validating my foggy memory.
The bulldozer ballast is a different story!
SDBOB
Posted: Monday, October 20, 2014 2:08:41 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/13/2005
Posts: 1,321
Location: Latrobe,Pa.
I wonder what OSHA has to say or a booklet on this subject LOL? Thanks for the info somebodies doing their homework.
JohnGalt
Posted: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:30:51 PM

Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/27/2007
Posts: 1,489
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
OSHA would say "Show me that you have calculated the heaviest pick at the farthest radius, and then show me a manufacturer's load chart that meets those requirements. Then show me that you have the correct piece of equipment, properly maintained and verified, and that it's being used by a licensed operator, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions." If all of those conditions are met, and nothing goes wrong, then they wouldn't have anything else to say.
SDBOB
Posted: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:38:10 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/13/2005
Posts: 1,321
Location: Latrobe,Pa.
Thanks John. I work around quarries and asphalt,concrete plants. I got myself in trouble 2 mos. ago. A federal mine inspector was at a quarry. I did not know him. He was with the super.He said there is a a federal mine inspector here make sure you have your safety gear on. OK I said then he said he is a real ........ I said they are only interested in the money.-fines he said I am the inspector and I said soooo.He said I'm done talking to you.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

SoClean Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.